Some
marriages bloom while others are doomed.
In a recent
judgment, HC Judge Choo made this candid observation: "With perfect lens
of hindsight it is obvious that this marriage was doomed 16 years ago."
This
marriage is the unfortunate union of a doctor and his clinic assistant wife.
The facts are quite depressing.
ROM in March
1990. Three children born out of this union with the eldest now 23 yrs old.
Everything spiraled down south in 2001, just 11 yrs after ROM.
Here is
what's doomed about it. The wife filed for three divorces in 2001 (dismissed in
2005 after a full trial), in 2010 (dismissed subsequently when contested) and
in 2015 (which went for another full trial), and came before Judge Choo in an
appeal.
Legal
technicalities aside, the union was a harvest of woes since 2001. And Judge
Choo even waxed lyrical in his judgment comparing it to a parallel event in
history: "Three wars were fought the day after Carthage and Rome realized
that they could not live together side by side. The Punic Wars as they are
known lasted more than a century from 261 BCE."
Here is what
the husband alleged transpired between them in a marital Wars of the Roses.
Since 2001,
the husband was charged in court on three separate occasions because his wife
complained to the CPF that he did not pay her CPF contributions (while working
as his nurse), that he sold medicine illegally, and that he bribed two patient
to testify for him. However, the husband was also acquitted on all three
occasions! Long story short, his wife's complaint did not hold water in court.
But that's
not all. The wife also complained to MOH and HSA about some illegally imported
medicine from Malaysia. When MOH and HSA raided the clinic, they found nothing.
The wife also complained to MOE on various occasions about her husband's bubble
tea business and he had to close his bubble tea shop.
She further
lodged a police report about her husband forging her signature to cash a
cheque, but no action was taken against the husband (as it turned out, it was
in fact her own signature). In 2003, the wife also applied for an injunction to
freeze his bank account, applied for enforcement of her maintenance, and
garnished his bank for failing to pay her costs for a maintenance appeal.
If you think
that's the end of the so called Punic Wars between them, think again. Here are
further allegations by the husband.
His wife
reported to the police about child abuse committed by the husband. But the
investigation found no cause. In Jan 2006, the wife "had beaten one of the
children so badly the child had to be treated in a hospital, but the husband
pleaded with the police not to prosecute the wife."
And in July
2015, she returned home to find the gate locked. Her attempts to force open the
gate agitated the family's two Rottweiler dogs "and when one of their
children (then aged 7) ran out on hearing the wife's shouting, the dogs
attacked the child so severely that the child's ear was bitten off."
Of course,
the wife had her side of her story, but the appeal Judge noted that "in
brief, the underlying facts were not denied." In fact, the wife appeared
to be in denial when she said that the children are not against her. The trial
judge however noted that "one of the children was found by the school counselor
to be "suicidal and murderous"".
It further
reports that "the husband explained that the child in question wanted to return
home to kill the mother (the wife)." It is therefore not surprising that
all three children testified in favor of their father against their mother.
Yet after
all that, the husband asserts that they still slept together, "had dinners
and walks together, and had activities with the children together."
In the end,
the husband got his divorce, but on the revised ground of the wife's desertion
of the family and not on his allegation of her unreasonable behavior (mainly
because those alleged events happened decades ago and he, strange as it might
be, still attempted reconciliation with her).
Lesson? Make
no mistakes, your greatest fortune or misfortune is your spouse. He or she can
make a heaven out of hell or a hell out of heaven. And if hell has no fury like
a woman scorned, then heaven has no place in a marriage torn.
While the
marriage vows reminded us that it is for better, for worse, for richer, for
poorer, in sickness and in health, until death do us part, in reality, at least
for some reality, emotional death as manifested in endless bitterness,
recriminations and revenge comes early for some hapless couple.
Alas, a
marriage can only take so much before the emotional bough breaks and the cradle
of marital bliss falls.
Frankly, I
have no illusions about marriage. A match may be stitched in heaven during the
wedding night, but it can turn into a nightmare after the froth in the
champagne glass settles.
Who are we
kidding? The divorce rates are rising and some modern marriages are like a
canary in the coal mine. All it takes is a whiff of one or two disappointments,
expectation falling short or a better alternative looming around to knock the
poor songbird off the perch.
Honestly, I
do not know of the secret to a long marriage. But I am quite sure about the
cause of a short one, and it is in a heart that has no room for anyone else
except oneself.
When we see
everything only through the prism of self, our world gets smaller, our
understanding narrows and our heart waxes cold. Somehow, nothing else matters
except how we feel about it. Soon, the measure of all happiness depends on what
makes us happy. We become self-referential, self-absorbed.
With the
obsession of self comes the destruction of everything else - including a union
that is supposedly destined to merge two imperfect lives into one unified
whole.
Let me end here. Judge
Choo wrote that even the Punic wars ended after the third war. I wish the
couple in the above case well. I hope for them peace henceforth. God knows they
and their children have gone through a lot. It is indeed time for healing for a
union that has sadly gone their separate ways long before this court case.
Cheerz.
No comments:
Post a Comment