What do you do when
an influential church member comes to you demanding that you ostracise another
member from the youth group just because he is dating his daughter?
What compounds it
is that he has been with you through thick and thin since the first brick was
laid and has been rather generous in his tithes, offerings and occasional love
gifts?
Here's another
crunch. What do you tell a young couple with a toddler when they tell you that they are leaving the church they have grown up with because the church does not provide the
same quality childcare services as another church does?
How about this one. Where do you draw
the line between being sympathetic to the genuine needs of the members and
being indulgent of their calculative, fastidious, and sometimes, unreasonable
demands?
How far do you go
with what they want, how they want it, when they want it, and for how long they
want it?
I know as church
leaders you are called to love your neighbor, warts and all, but how should you
mediate the conflicts of interests between the mindless demands of growth and
the restless cries in your heart to remain authentic to the faith?
The reality is,
some members will wear you down. Some will challenge your belief in humanity.
Some will question your leadership when she doesn't get her way. Others will
just talk behind your back - rather annoyingly, to put it mildly.
And it gets worse
with the office staff and the pastoral team. Some churches are built upon both
the shamrock of Christ and the cult of personality.
The pyramid of
leadership reaches up to the pinnacle of one or two charismatically glowing
personalities, who are incidentally also the founders of the church. Being the
founders, they control almost everything, that is, the church and all. Putting
it bluntly, you can say that they own it; brick
and mortar, paint and quota.
Take them away from
the churches' equation, and the church is effectively headless, so to speak.
Unfortunately, by way of perception, they are quite indispensable.
So, what do you do
with a church that is based on the sole authority of one or two leaders at the
top who effectively runs the show, calls the shots, brings in the crowd and
draws in the funds?
Surely, disagreeing
with them in your subordinate pastoral role or church office staff position
would somehow dim or sabotage your career prospect in the church
right? Alas, the politics in church is sadly no different from the
politics in the world, save that the former starts and ends every meeting with
a word of prayer.
Charles
Swindoll once wrote that as the church grows rapidly, it runs the risk of
"replacing volunteerism with professionalism."
He added: "The
church was never meant to be a "professional organization". We'll let
the world have all of those. The church is not a slick, efficient corporation
with a cross stuck on its roof. It is a ministry. We do not look to the government
for support or to the state for direction. We don't seek the counsel of Wall
Street for financial suggestions. We have one Head, the Lord Jesus Christ. We
do not rely on any earthly organization or some rich individuals to sustain the
ministry. The church is a spiritual entity, built up and supported by its
Founder, Jesus, who promised to build His church.""
It is therefore not
easy to run, lead or shoulder the responsibilities of a rapidly growing church
whether as a leader dealing with the members' seemingly endless demands and
expectations, as a church staff hoping that things would be
different in the household of God as compared to the secular world, or as a
layperson witnessing the transformation of your church into an efficient,
professional and multimillion-dollar organization.
Is it then true that
when idealism and pragmatism clash, people in general gravitate towards
the middle road of tactical inauthenticity?
Notwithstanding the
above, my post this morning is not to talk about the spiritual complacency or
administrative woes of a professional church, god knows I've already said my
peace in my previous posts here.
But my post this
morning is to sincerely empathize with and support those who are faithful to
the call in the ministry, and are earnestly travailing for a breakthrough for
growth not so much in numbers, but hearts.
And taking Jesus'
example here would be a good start. Before He left, Jesus told Peter to feed
his sheep, take care of them. He repeated it three times with this initial
probing question: Peter, do
you love me?
Undeniably there
are leaders/members in churches who love their Savour. They faithfully offer
their time, effort and life to the ministry in silent service and without
fanfare.
But let me just say
that loving Him is the easy part. It comes almost naturally for a believer.
Yet, during His
time, I believe Jesus was very much hated by many. He was considered a
rabble-rouser, a troublemaker, a rebel for the lost. The government deemed him
a political threat, the teachers of the law deemed him as religiously defiant,
and the local authority deemed him a stubborn non-conformist. Almost everybody
in power, statute and wealth found him a threat.
How did Jesus then
operate in a hostile world he lived in? How did He make a lasting difference
despite the hate, the rage and the disappointments?
Well, He did it all
in love. He kept the big picture in His heart - his Father's business. He knew nothing was going to shake the
foundation of love, hope and faith upon which He stood on.
That is why I
believe He kept asking Peter to do the same. If Peter loves Him, feed His
sheep, take care of them, guide them in the ways of overcoming, and connect
with them in a way that is life-changing.
More relevantly, He
first set the example, and then became the transforming influence.
So, loving Jesus is
never about embracing an ideal, feeling warmth and fuzzy inside, and then
walking away with an ember glow in our faces.
It is on the
contrary hard work. It is about paying the price, counting the cost. It is
about bearing the Cross and sharing the bleeding heart of our Savior. It is
essentially a labor of love and sweat.
Alas, Dietrich
Bonheoffer’s words ring so true and deep here: "Those who love their dream
of a Christian community more than the Christian community itself become
destroyers of that Christian community even though their personal intentions
may be ever so honest, earnest and sacrificial."
For pastors,
under-shepherds and church leaders, the simple call to love is an enduring call
to make that connection with the sheep regardless of how trying, challenging or
tiring they can be.
Jesus did just
that, even as he bore the Cross on the road to grief. It was a sacrifice that
not only moved the elements of nature, but it moved the hearts of the most
impenitent, even till today.
Let me end with the
words of Henri Nouwen who said:-
"When we say,
"I love Jesus, but I hate the Church," we end up losing not only the
Church but Jesus too. The challenge is to forgive the Church. This challenge is
especially great because the Church seldom asks us for forgiveness."
Indeed, the Church
seldom asks for forgiveness. It invites and facilitates the act of repentance.
It creates an altar space for kneeling, confessing and renouncing. But they are
seldom self-administering. And unless the sins of the core leadership are made
public, be it pride, greed, envy or the lust for power, the Church carries on
business as usual.
My concern is that her servitude to orthodoxy and to the ideal of piety often blindsides the leadership to her own fragile humanity. What sadly makes it even tougher is
that the groupishness she develops over time in the critical mass attained
often turns into an echo chamber of approval/support that effectively shields
the core leadership from self-examination and correction.
Be
that as it may, Jesus' triple reminders to Peter ultimately prevail - Feed
my lambs, take care of my sheep and feed my sheep. Individually and collectively, whether leaders, church staff or layperson, we are reminded always that Christ died for the Church so that we
as the Church may live for Him by loving the Church in return, warts and all.
And the challenge may be especially great, but greater is He in us than he in the world. Cheerz.
* image from heaven
await.wordpress.