Here’s the
prayer challenge recently posed: Should everybody pray for Mitt Romney to win
the coming presidential election? Below is my view on it.
“You know prayer
is a funny business. The believers endorse it without questions. The critics
denounce it without reservation. Some attribute it to the hand of God. Others
attribute it to pure luck or the gambling hand of random chance.
There is a
case where a prostitute named Hilda prayed for deliverance from her dastardly
"vocation" and she was duly delivered. Another case of Billy Graham
praying against her daughter's divorce and he was quietly disappointed.
This reminds
me of one incident I read. A pastor once heard a mother giving testimony that
her 2 year old son fell into a swimming pool and the lifeguard revived him by
artificial respiration. The mother exclaimed, "Isn't God wonderful?"
Then, sitting in the congregation, quietly and hidden, was another mother whose
son also fell in a swimming pool, was pulled out, but make it he didn't.
I guess for
every petition posted to God that are victoriously answered, there maybe ten or
more petitions anonymously marked "return to sender".
One author
wrote, "Biblical prayer is impertinent, persistence, shameless,
indecorous. It is more like haggling in an outdoor bazaar than the polite
monologues of the church". Another wrote, "Prayers like gravel flung
at the sky's window, hoping to attract the loved one's attention." Any
takers?
I am always
afraid of the "sharpshooter's fallacy" when it comes to prayer.
Imagine a NRA member empties the barrel of his gun into the wall of his barn
and then walks over and conveniently draws the bull's-eye around the bullet
holes. In a church context, this fallacy can turn fanatical as captured in this
admonishment, "If it comes true, it's God's glory. If not, its your own
folly."
There's a
seminary joke about a man who steps out of a curb and a car narrowly misses
him. He exclaims, "Providence was looking out for me." Then, the next
day, he steps out again and is hit by a car. He is admitted, treated and
finally recovered. He exclaims, "Isn't it marvelous how God spared
him?" Third time unlucky, he is hit by a car and died. At his funeral,
some say, "Well, God saw fit to take him home."
Personally, I
used to pray in Court to win a case until I realized that some of my Christian
opponents were praying the same thing. Then, it dawned on me that being
all-powerful and all-knowing is not "all-blessing" because how do you
decide on whose side should your favor rest?
This again
reminds me of a poet's prayer called the "good war" during WWII. It
goes like this: "Gracious Lord, oh bomb the Germans. Spare their women for
thy sake, and if that is not too easy, we will pardon thy mistake. But gracious
Lord, whate'er shall be, don't let anyone bomb me."
Someone once
asked Gandhi this, "If you were given the power to remake this world, what
would you do first?" He replied, "I would pray for power to renounce
that power." I think Christians who think that prayers will be answered
100% are filling in the shoes that are too big for them to fill. For a less
stressful and more fulfilling earthly existence, I humbly recommend that they
forthwith resign from being the general manager of the universe!
After that,
my prayers in court are restricted to "give me strength" rather than
"give me victory".
So, when it
is proposed that everybody prays for Romney (however silly this is), I suspect
that they will do the same in the Obama's camp. What should God do then?
Doesn't this make God a republican by default or an unabashed market driven
capitalist? Should prayer be even used for such thing? Maybe, prayer should
only be used when everybody can unanimously agree on the desired outcome like
healing from cancer or certain death, or for finding a dog or passing a school
test. But then, if the latter is answered, we will have a society of top but
ordinary scholars. Very democratic but
hardly practical.
As such, I
think even Einstein would relent (or have second thoughts about the science of
prayer). When a doctoral student at Princeton once asked him, "What is
there left in the world for original dissertation research?" He replied,
"Find out about prayer. Somebody must find out about prayer." Well,
to borrow X-files' tagline, "the truth is out there." Or it may
forever stay out there, who knows?
That's the
whole "shebang" about prayer, it is beyond empirical verification.
There are just too many variables, factors and issues involved for any
dependable distilled conclusion. At best, it is an inferring correlation and
not a direct causation. The sample group would be too uncertain, the bias
effect too unwieldy, and the result too unreliable for science to ever nail
down any affirmative answer.
I think it
was Oscar Wilde who said, "when the gods wish to punish us, they answer
our prayers." This may sound wholly irreverent but there is some truth to
it, if but only a smidgen. I always believe the phenomena of prayer somehow
works the same way that those HDB hopefuls do when they unyieldingly queue up
at the lottery booth. The difference is that one is petitioning to a definite
hope and other to their charming luck.
Most of the
time, for some prayers which are already foregone or predetermined (I know the
charismatics will cast stones at me for this), and with the benefit of serene
hindsight, it is not the results that matter. But it is the bended knees that
counts. Pardon me, I am just being pragmatic.
So, the
effectiveness of prayer in most cases is not so much in the results as it is in
the act. Characters are changed, hope revived, and efforts redoubled with
sincere petitioning. For the true believers, it is a peace of mind that is
usually the bigger miracle rather than an act divine.
Let me end
with the words of FB Meyer, "The greatest tragedy in life is not
unanswered prayer, but unoffered prayer." So, if I have to choose between
bended knees and a defying ego, I’d choose the former in a heartbeat. Cheers
out.”
No comments:
Post a Comment