Early
this week, this caption in the Straits Times caught my attention:-
Religious fire pit in Toa Payoh used for barbecue.
Thereafter
it kept me thinking. Mm...using a place meant for religious activities, in this
case, a designated pit to conduct taoist rites and offering, for personal and
family leisure, that is, a barbecue outing. I see a parallel here in the
churches. Taking this news as a metaphor, I can think of 6 uses of our modern
churches that depart from its original purpose.
1)
As a social gathering. This is
unavoidable. Many famous atheists including the late philosopher extraordinaire
Bertrand Russell enjoyed the gregarious culture of the church. The people
factor is infectious. If no man is an island, then the church is great place to
meet people. We flourish through social interactions and many find their life partners
there too. Frienships are also forged and ties are strengthened when people
come together. But what is unavoidable is also that which distracts the most.
There is always a risk that we attend and stay in church because of the company
and nothing else. For some of us, the attraction is in the numbers and big churches
today lack neither the numbers nor the opportunity to make the social
connection. Some churches tend to measure themselves against the three Bs:
buildings, budgets and bodies. And at most times, it is the latter (bodies)
that exerts the greatest hold over the people. In our eagerness to meet people,
mingle with the crowd and regale them with our knowledge, accolades and
spirituality, we often bypass the one person whose presence and attention we
need most. No points for guessing who that person is. I think Dietrich Bonhoeffer puts it well, “Anyone who loves the dream of community more
than the Christian community itself (warts and all) becomes a destroyer of the
latter even though the devotion to the former is faultless and the intentions
may be ever so honest, earnest and sacrificial.”
2)
As a personal, exclusive club. This
is another unavoidable outcome that flows from the first usage above. As the
numbers get bigger, people will invariably polarize. People with certain interest
will gravitate towards group with similar interest. It is therefore not
uncommon to find cliques forming within the church that discriminate against
members who do not see things their way. Although such discrimination is not
blatant or open, they are felt nevertheless after a while and they all add up.
For example, I heard of a cell group that endorsed Calvinism wholeheartedly and
believed that only those specially elected were saved. Such doctrinal
differences can be divisive and those who did not accept their view were generally
tolerated. The key word is tolerated.
Most times, such toleration percolated through the group's patronizing
smiles, condescending squints and arm-length association. Sooner or later, the
toleration will reek of discrimination and the lone ranger will soon feel
alienated. Friendships and faith can be undermined because of such unspoken discrimination.
3)
As an entertainment center. I guess
this is a very tempting reason for people to join the church, especially the
megachurches. The annual passion plays, the exciting church camps, the high
energy stage performances, the awe-inspiring media and video presentation, and
the larger-than-life preachers all elevates the church into a carnival-like,
mediagenic, pyrotechnical prominence. When the wisemen were looking for the
manger where Jesus was born, they followed a star over Bethlehem. Nowadays,
just entering the sanctuary of a well-equipped church, you will literally
see stars. The ambience is electrifying. It is like a night in a visually
stunning pop concert. Gone are the days of monosyllabic welcome, monochromatic
wall colors, and monologue-like sermons. I can therefore understand how the
attraction can be irresistible. But this is unfortunately the same reason why some
members are losing their spiritual bearings after a while. As the environment
gets more complicated, the vision also gets less focused. This is also where
the church becomes more of a “feel-good” entertainment hotspot rather than an
unpretentious place of personal devotion and worship. In other words, instead
of becoming more relevant to God, the Church becomes more relevant to the
world. The keen observation of Carl Braaten in The Gospel for a Neopagan Culture is instructive, “The church is tempted to become relevant to
the people of this culture by using their wishes and criteria rather than those
of the church. Evangelism is then driven by a market or consumer-oriented
mentality. The church can “meet people’s needs” as people define their needs.
Thus the people who may have little or no recent experience in the church
develop the evaluation of the church and the church struggles to fulfill their
expectations.”
4)
As a personal wishing well. I once heard
a testimony about a member thanking God for blessing her with a timely win in
the national lottery. For the undiscerning, this peculiar kind of testimony
never fails to whet their appetites for the same blessing. The enticement is
like a kid going into a giant Toys R Us store and filling up his trolley with
all that he can carry totally free of charge. Although many would be discreet
about making their Christmas shopping list public to the god they view as their
divine Santa Claus, it is undeniable that the promises of the Bible may be misinterpreted
by them to mean that God is their personal celestial butler or their
uncondtional material provider. Some may even come to Church expecting more
blessings than sacrifices. Somehow our needs come first and God seems to be the
means of fulfilling them. Here, the words of Os Guineess hit the nail on the
head, “The exaggerated half-truths about
the church’s needing to meet needs...breeds unintended consequences. Just as
church-growth’s modern passion for “relevance” will become its road to
irrelevance, so its modern passion for “felt needs” will turn the church into
an echo chamber of fashionable needs that drown out the one voice that
addresses real human need below all felt needs. After all, if true needs are a
first step toward faith and prayer, false needs are the opposite. As George
MacDonald observed, “That need which is no need, is a demon sucking at the
spring of your life.” Alas, the ferris wheel of greed is further greased up
by the pulpit teachings of prosperity preachers who make personal enrichment an
inalienable right of the believers. There is in fact a dubious teaching that is
making its rounds which gives the impression that those who serve a big god
should expect big things from him. And the only limitation to such unlimited
blessing is the believer’s limiting faith. I guess the irony is that the people
who are truly profiting from the prosperity teachings are the teachers
themselves.
5)
As a platform for the ministry of self.
This is one usage of the church that is most hard to detect but most unsurprising
since the journey of faith is always one of self versus God. The tussle is
almost endless. For some, the self unfortunately wins with God taking second
place. But such carnal and empty victory is often discreetly masqueraded on the
stage or in the ministry. Leaders are particularly vulnerable to this
adulteration. As the church gets bigger or the ministry gets more successful,
the attention and adoration also follow suit. With attention and adoration, the
leaders will start to believe in their own invulnerability. And invulnerability
invariably nourishes pride and pride inevitably elevates self. This cycle is
not only vicious, it is also viciously self-reinforcing. I recall 2 Corinthians 12:10 which reads, “For when I am weak, then I am strong.” For those who privately
believe in their own invulnerability, it is a case of “for when I am weak, then I am not strong.” In the book The Emotionally Healthy Church by Peter
Scazzero, I learn that one can be “spiritually
mature while remaining emotionally immature.” The author went on to list
down some very interesting observations about leadership as follows:-
* You can be a dynamic, gifted
speaker for God in public and be an unloving spouse and parent at home.
* You can function as a church board
member or pastor and be unteachable, insecure and defensive.
* You can memorize entire books of
the New Testament and still be unaware of your depression and anger, even
displacing it on other people.
* You can fast and pray a half-day a
week for years as a spiritual discipline and constantly be critical of others,
justifying it as discernment.
* You can lead hundred of people in
a Christian ministry while driven by a deep personal need to compensate for a
nagging sense of failure.
* You can pray for deliverance from
the demonic realm when in reality you are simply avoiding conflict, repeating
an unhealthy patten of behavior traced back to the home in which you grew up.
6)
As a competitive corporation. It is
strange that this last form of church usage is even considered here. Isn’t the church set apart from the world?
But the reality is that megachurches do compete with one another whether they
admit it or not. There is always this my-church-is-bigger-than-yours or
your-members-are-defecting-to-my-church mentality, which is of course kept
close to one's chest. Running a megachurch is often a case of running a
business. As members and money roll in, the church becomes bogged down by
regulations and rules, protoccols and procedures, doctrinal stasis and
inflexibility. Suddenly, filling up the seats becomes a sales quota to meet. Church
staff are all suit up to offer their best side without showing the side that really
matters. Members’ feeling are treated with kid gloves; especially the
influential and rich ones. And the services become a series of weekly clockwork
arrangements with zero tolerance for errors. As the church grows even bigger,
partly as a result of people attracting people, it becomes less souls-oriented
and more program-oriented. Even the winning of souls turns into a competitive
sport between churches. Soon, the leadership becomes inward-focus and the staff
under pressure are expected to produce tangible results; most of which are
measured against a worldly benchmark. In the end, the irony is that the same
qualities that helped the church to grow into a spiritual behemoth are also the
same qualities that caused her to become bloated and overbearing. Alas, I guess
there is no one-size-fits-all solution for the problems that come with runaway
church growth. Each leadership will have to come to God in their own way to
borrow His lamp to light the path under their feet. One author puts it this
way, “I stopped waiting on the Lord for a
growing church and started to simply wait on the Lord for him alone.” (Peter
Scazzero)
Let
me leave you with this poem by John Newton about growing as a Christian and
about how God works in ways most disagreeable to our human expectations.
“I ask the Lord that I might grow
In faith, and in love, and every grace,
Might more of his salvation know
And seek more earnestly his face.
I hoped that in some favoured hour
At once He’d answer my request,
And by His love’s constraining power
Subdue my sins, and give me rest.
Instead of this, He made me feel
The hidden evils of my heart;
And let the angry powers of hell
Assault my soul in every part.”
Cheerz.
No comments:
Post a Comment